Even As Entire Governments Attempt Furious Damage Control Over Tucker Carlson's Forthcoming Interview With Putin, Recall That Carlson Still Has The Julian Assange Interview In His Back Pocket...
Yep! Yet another great piece, Brian! I have to believe that Tucker is protecting himself, Assange, and his interview(s) with bulletproof dead switches because the incentive to take them all out has to be overwhelming. As you intimidated, these demon possessed cretins play for keeps....
~ Brian, I'm not so sure abt Seth Rich being the conduit to Wikileaks at least for the Podesta emails. Remember it was a simple spear-fishing incident. Perhaps an inside job, but from another place, IT: "Dell SecureWorks concluded Fancy Bear had sent Podesta an email on March 19, 2016, that had the appearance of a Google security alert, but actually contained a misleading link—a strategy known as spear-phishing.." wikipedia "Delavan had actually meant to type that it was “not a legitimate email,” but mistakenly omitted the word not. Are you sure, I asked? “Yes,” he said... And Delavan noted to me, accurately, that he included in his email a link to Google’s genuine password-change site, which would not have stolen Podesta’s credentials... Indeed, he had instructed many people not to click links in suspect emails over the course of the campaign. But in this case, he overlooked it... No, he said: He had continued to work for Clinton in the same capacity right up until the campaign ended... If I were to look at similar messages he had sent around that time to other staffers getting phished, Delavan told me, I would see that they said, “This is not a legitimate email.” Unfortunately, he said, he can’t prove it, because “they would have all been deleted.”
Was there any lesson he could take from all this? “I don’t know,” Delavan said. “I guess I would say double-check before you … I don’t know. I don’t know.”
As far as the DNC hack, we have DCLeaks, Guccifer 2.0, and an 'assessment' that Fancy Bear (behind the Podesta leaks), was behind the other email hack. But the scale & scope of emails revealed from the DNC are obviously of wider interest & include some personal info (credit card & Social Security info) that if Seth wanted to get back at leadership I don't think he could have included.
I'm still waiting to see if UndeadFOIA can connect the dots w/Sussman, Joffe, et. al. w/network traffic info & govt systems access that they had.
Your main point is true: Crowdstrike was a cover story, DC insiders have made the Assange-Putin connection even if the won't report/talk abt it, & there is some connection to the Ukraine crew & work done there pre-election. Many thanks for your reporting. ~ Will
Whoa. Dastardly twist. So timing is everything. Tucker has to be thinking about all the games they played with Papadopolis, Flynn, Page, and of course Trump. The danger is real. They can’t let this hit mass consumption.
Who turned on so many lights?!? God Bless!!!
……add to all of the above one more thing. Is Trump in Russia?
Thanks, Brian….you’re right on 🎯!!
WOW. I had not thought about or connected those DOTS!!!
Thanks Brian this REALLY puts a big smile on my face.
Keep it coming!
God Wins!
God Bless!!!
Perfect 👍
Thanks, Brian!
Yep! Yet another great piece, Brian! I have to believe that Tucker is protecting himself, Assange, and his interview(s) with bulletproof dead switches because the incentive to take them all out has to be overwhelming. As you intimidated, these demon possessed cretins play for keeps....
~ Brian, I'm not so sure abt Seth Rich being the conduit to Wikileaks at least for the Podesta emails. Remember it was a simple spear-fishing incident. Perhaps an inside job, but from another place, IT: "Dell SecureWorks concluded Fancy Bear had sent Podesta an email on March 19, 2016, that had the appearance of a Google security alert, but actually contained a misleading link—a strategy known as spear-phishing.." wikipedia "Delavan had actually meant to type that it was “not a legitimate email,” but mistakenly omitted the word not. Are you sure, I asked? “Yes,” he said... And Delavan noted to me, accurately, that he included in his email a link to Google’s genuine password-change site, which would not have stolen Podesta’s credentials... Indeed, he had instructed many people not to click links in suspect emails over the course of the campaign. But in this case, he overlooked it... No, he said: He had continued to work for Clinton in the same capacity right up until the campaign ended... If I were to look at similar messages he had sent around that time to other staffers getting phished, Delavan told me, I would see that they said, “This is not a legitimate email.” Unfortunately, he said, he can’t prove it, because “they would have all been deleted.”
Was there any lesson he could take from all this? “I don’t know,” Delavan said. “I guess I would say double-check before you … I don’t know. I don’t know.”
As far as the DNC hack, we have DCLeaks, Guccifer 2.0, and an 'assessment' that Fancy Bear (behind the Podesta leaks), was behind the other email hack. But the scale & scope of emails revealed from the DNC are obviously of wider interest & include some personal info (credit card & Social Security info) that if Seth wanted to get back at leadership I don't think he could have included.
I'm still waiting to see if UndeadFOIA can connect the dots w/Sussman, Joffe, et. al. w/network traffic info & govt systems access that they had.
Your main point is true: Crowdstrike was a cover story, DC insiders have made the Assange-Putin connection even if the won't report/talk abt it, & there is some connection to the Ukraine crew & work done there pre-election. Many thanks for your reporting. ~ Will
forgot to note Delavan quotes came from Slate article: https://slate.com/technology/2016/12/an-interview-with-charles-delavan-the-it-guy-whose-typo-led-to-the-podesta-email-hack.html
Whoa. Dastardly twist. So timing is everything. Tucker has to be thinking about all the games they played with Papadopolis, Flynn, Page, and of course Trump. The danger is real. They can’t let this hit mass consumption.