Hillary & DNC Go For 3-Time-Loser Status On The Same Lie That's Already Failed Twice
This is honestly and truly amazing - and points to how determined these parties are to thwart the Durham Special Counsel's subpoenas
Make sure you read my previous columns about the filings in the Durham case before proceeding here because I’ll be mentioning previous filings often, and don’t have time to go into the background on them again. It would take many paragraphs to catch you up if you haven’t done the required reading.
I realize it’s a lot of reading, but if you want to be fully caught up with where things stand right now with the current filings in Durham’s case against former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, you need adequate background.
They Are All Committing A Felony Right Now In Open View In Judge Cooper’s Courtroom
Durham has already supplied plenty of documentary evidence to the court in his filings pertaining to Fusion GPS’s contract work for the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee [DNC].
He has made it abundantly clear that Fusion was contracted to create Trump/Russia hoaxes, and indeed played an instrumental role in the construction two specific hoaxes: the Alfa Bank hoax and the Steele Dossier hoax.
And yet…and yet last week multiple outside parties to this case rushed to Judge Christopher Cooper’s courtroom to file motions to intervene and also signed declarations where they insisted on lying to the court about the true nature of Fusion’s contracted activities.
In turn, Hillary For America [HFA], the DNC, Perkins Coie, Fusion GPS and former Neustar Vice-President Rodney Joffe all insisted in their official filings in federal court that Fusion had only been hired to dispense legal counsel and liability advice.
I am absolutely astonished that these parties are attempting to so transparently lie to federal judge Christopher Cooper about this.
It’s not like there haven’t already been extensive federal and congressional investigations into exactly what it was that Fusion was actually doing for the Hillary For America campaign and for the DNC back in 2016/17.
It’s been known for years that HFA/DNC attempted to hide the payments to Fusion GPS for the dirty trick Russia hoax projects they worked on by running the money through their campaign lawyers at Perkins Coie and hiding it as ‘consulting’ fees.
Devin Nunes and his crack investigator Kash Patel unearthed the truth about Fusion’s work for the Clinton campaign back in late 2017 while conducting a congressional investigation.
Then the Federal Election Commission [FEC] conducted it’s own very thorough investigation into this issue with the agency finding more than sufficient documented evidence to rule that HFA and the DNC had filed false financial reports.
Having reached that conclusion, the FEC then fined both HFA & the DNC for deliberately trying to hide the true purpose of the payments to Fusion.
The documentary evidence is clear and it is compelling.
Which is why Special Counsel John Durham placed the FEC documents into the official Sussmann case court docket as evidence he’ll present at trial.
SpyGate researcher Techno Fog instantly grasped why Durham was dropping the FEC case into the Sussmann court docket.
The FEC did a detailed deep dive into the financial records and reports of Hillary for America, the DNC, and Fusion GPS and at the end of their investigation fined the HFA campaign and the DNC for making deceptive filings that attempted to hide the true nature of Fusion’s contracting work.
And now these idiots are back again repeating the same lie in their Motions to Intervene in the Sussmann case, as well as filing signed declarations repeating the lie.
How did it come to this? How was Durham able to successfully goad these people into transparently lying to federal officers of the court?
Are these same people seriously about to try to make this exact same argument again to Judge Cooper, after having abysmally failed both times they previously tried this defense with Congressional investigators and a federal agency, the FEC?
It sure looks like it.
Durham Appears To Be Preparing To Compel Testimony At Trial From Former Fusion GPS Employee
In a recent filing Durham had said he was working towards an immunity deal for a former Fusion GPS employee.
That employee was very likely Laura Seago.
Judge Cooper just granted the SCO's motion to UNSEAL an application to the court to Compel Testimony at trial from Laura Seago.
This looks like the immunity deal fell though and like the HFA and DNC people who got federal trial subpoenas to testify at trial, Seago is also going to be compelled to appear and testify to the jury under oath.
Durham Will Compel Testimony From Multiple Witnesses At Sussmann’s Trial
Durham did say in a filing he’d not only flipped Researcher-2 [believed to be David Dagon] and gotten him an immunity deal for that massive national security breach he’d participated in [stealing federal classified info while spying on a sitting President & the White House as part of a private spy network funded and directed by Hillary Clinton & the DNC], he was also in the process of trying to work out an immunity deal with a former Fusion GPS employee who will very likely be testifying in court as to the actual nature of Fusion’s work as a contractor for HFA & the DNC.
And now we know the name of this former Fusion employee.
Remember: both Robby Mook and John Podesta made signed declarations to the Court that Fusion was hired to give legal counsel, and therefore they are asserting their attorney/client privileges to defy a subpoena from a federal grand jury for over 1,400 Fusion documents related to the Alfa Bank and Steele dossier hoaxes.
Joffe, HFA, DNC, Fusion, Perkins Coie all rushed to court last week to assert in their motions to intervene that Judge Cooper MUST NOT GRANT Durham’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents via In Camera Review by asserting that their a/c privileges shields all the outstanding documents from the SCO and it’s grand jury.
Seago will be testify for the government, should this case go to trial, that all these parties are attempting to DECEIVE THE COURT when they claim Fusion was providing any kind of legal or liability counsel to clients.
Here’s a question nobody’s asking, and they really should:
Is it a federal felony to falsely assert attorney/client privilege in an attempt to hide documents from a grand jury? Documents that directly pertain to a criminal joint venture currently under investigation by federal prosecutors?
What happens if Judge Cooper grants Durham’s motion for an in camera review and he subsequently discovers none of the Fusion documents contain legal advice or counsel about liability or possible future litigation? Is he going to rule that these parties that filed motions to intervene attempted to deceive him?
While I was writing this column, a new entry appeared in the court docket revealing that Judge Cooper has just **granted** Durham’s motion for an in camera review of the outstanding Fusion GPS documents.
Sussmann’s trial is still slated to begin on May 16, a mere 12 days away, so I was expected movement on this issue.
Judge Cooper and his staff have 12 days to complete their in camera review of the Fusion documents and then hand to Durham whatever they determine to not be shielded by attorney/client privilege.
This latest Substack column is brought to you by Resist The Mainstream. RTM is a new website dedicated to covering the news and events that the mainstream media ignores or attempts to suppress. I am now on the editorial staff there.
You can also check out One Source Solutions, a great payment processor site run by and for patriots. Tired of cancel culture and worried about getting deplatformed by PayPal or some other Silicone Valley website? Here’s your answer. Be sure to tell them Brian sent ya!
To support my independent journalism, you can also make a donation of any size to my Venmo, CashApp or PayPal accounts.
And I thank you for your support. :)