Surprise! Durham Is Still Coming...
He's Going To Prove The Clinton Campaign Paid A Russian Agent To Accuse Innocent Americans of Being Russian Agents. And The FBI Knew This & Used The Steele Dossier For A FISA Warrant Anyway
I had just gotten back from an appointment with my chiropractor in Sarasota and was eating dinner as I scrolled through my Telegram feed to see what I’d missed in the day’s news when I came across the kind of post I’ve been expecting to come across for 2 months now.
It was from my friend Kyle, who goes by the name “Just Human” on social media:
“Durham’s brief court filing on Wednesday requested the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to issue “thirty subpoenas” for an “appearance before said Court at Alexandria, Virginia,” starting on Oct. 11 “to testify on behalf of the United States.” The potential witnesses are not named, but a copy of the blank subpoena reads that “YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear.””
Kyle followed that up with this:
LOL! at everyone who bought the nonsense that Durham was done, winding down, lacking funds, etc.
Take note of who tried to sell that narrative to you and don't buy anything else they are selling unless it comes with receipts.
You can keep track of the Special Counsel's Office here:
https://www.justice.gov/sco-durham
You can keep track of developments in the Danchenko case here:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60698540/united-states-v-danchenko/
I made a few immediate posts of my own on my Telegram channel at this news:
Brian Laughing At Everyone Who Said Durham Was Shutting Down
https://youtube.com/shorts/f2vrui3Z4VE?feature=share
It was just last month that media reports helped kick off a new cycle of “Durham Is So Over” news stories across the news media spectrum.
I realize of course that what these reporters are doing is looking at the DOJ filings on the Special Counsel’s Office when they are publicly released, and then commenting on the financials of Durham’s investigation. Nothing wrong with that. It’s newsworthy information.
But this is twice now that disclosures of spending by the Durham SCO has led to media speculation based on what the amount of money spent ‘should be’ that Durham is winding down and getting ready to close shop.
Paul Sperry is an excellent investigative reporter and he can certainly be forgiven for engaging in a bit of speculation based on the numbers he was looking at. But this is twice now he’s done this.
This exact same pattern unfolded in August of last year just before Durham dropped his indictment on DC Democrat power lawyer Michael Sussmann in September. Durham SCO financials were released, reporters were singularly unimpressed with the spending figures, and began speculating this was a sign Durham was either spinning his wheels in futility or was about to close his doors. And then we got two indictments and two trials scheduled.
I said about this curious pattern that’s been repeated several times now:
You always know Durham’s about to drop something when you see the usual round of “Durham’s been shut down or he’s about to be”.
They started up again last week.
People can be forgiven for thinking nothing was happening since the DC jury let Sussmann walk in late May. On the surface, it did look like nothing was happening.
How good is Durham’s operational security? When I checked the Courtlistener web page for the Danchenko case just two days ago during a conversation I was having with Tracy Beanz, the last entry in the court docket was listed as being on May 23rd.
I commented to her about the lack of any filing activity for the entire month of June.
Little did I know!
Because when Durham filed his request with Judge Anthony Trenga of the federal court for the Eastern District of Virginia, an impenetrable curtain was suddenly pulled back that revealed…this:
Everything inside the red box wasn’t made public until July 13. There had been 9 previous filings in the month of June, not one of which had been leaked. Including a protective order for defendant Igor Danchenko granted by Judge Trenga on June 22nd.
The entire time people were claiming Durham was wrapping it up and getting ready to shut down, all this court activity was going on in utter secrecy.
No leaks.
This protective order was granted to prevent someone - or several persons - from having any contact whatsoever with the defendant in this case. Why was this order filed?
Because I suspect thanks to the discovery it had been given by the government thus far, Danchenko’s legal team had a pretty good idea what evidence Durham has, and more importantly, who’d be subpoenaed to involuntarily appear at the upcoming trial.
And they didn’t want any of these people angrily contacting their client to complain about having received a subpoena from the Durham Special Counsel’s Office.
Now Durham’s done it again. He’s dropped 30 trial subpoenas on a large amount of people, many of whom I suspect do not want to have to go into that federal courtroom in the Eastern District of Virginia and be put under oath and answer questions put to them by the Special Counsel’s office in front of a jury.
I suspect over the course of the next several weeks, you’re going to see stories planted in the media where targets of these Durham subpoenas are leaking to reporters about how exceedingly unhappy they are and demanding somebody do something to get Durham under control. Another cycle from last year that will be repeated.
Kash Patel had this to say after this news about Durham’s 30 subpoenas dropped during a live interview with with Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes:
"When you are issuing thirty trial subpoenas...not grand jury subpoenas....you're telling the judge I've got thirty witnesses that I'm going fly in from all over the country and the world to prosecute this case shows you how seriously John Durham is moving on this matter because this is the fulcrum of the case....
It intersects the Clinton campaign with their dirty deeds...their fake money...Christopher Steele and the likes of fusion GPS...
Danchenko was caught and these thirty subpoenas are going to shed information at the heart of this matter by real people in federal court."
Sussmann Walking Due To A Swamp Jury Didn’t Change The Evidence Presented
It was certainly disappointing that the Washington DC jury decided to ignore the evidence the Special Counsel’s Office presented against Sussmann in order to acquit him of having lied about his clients to the FBI when he handed off the Alfa Bank Hoax he and so many others at Perkins Coie, Fusion GPS, Georgia Technical and at the Clinton Campaign had put so much time and effort into concocting.
Ah well!
Life goes on!
What was Sussmann facing, anyway, had he been convicted on that single solitary charge of making a false statement? As a respected DC Democrat Swamp lawyer with no criminal record, upon conviction he very likely would have gotten a minimum sentence of a couple months probation and a fine.
When you pull back to get the big picture on the Sussmann case, what stands out is all the evidence that Durham managed to get into the public sphere with the Summan & Danchenko indictments and then the subsequent 8 months of court filings in Sussmann’s case in which he dropped one bombshell after another.
Not the least of which were:
That longtime Clinton family flunky and political operative Chuck Dolan was a source for at least one of the fake allegations Danchenko gave to Christopher Steele that ended up in the dossier. That didn’t leak out in over five years. Nobody knew about it until Durham himself was ready to reveal it in the Sussman indictment. And Chuck Dolan is a name you will be hearing quite a big about during this upcoming Danchenko trial.
That the Clinton campaign had it’s own private cyber-spying network comprised of federal contractors with access to sensitive government law enforcement and intelligence agency databases. These contractors were actually double-dipping, getting paid by federal entities and agencies to improve cyber security as they were also being paid by the Clinton campaign to steal data on certain specific and carefully designated political targets. Some of that stolen data made it’s way into The Alfa Bank Hoax and, I suspect, The Steele Dossier Hoax as well.
Clinton herself approved the giving of the Alfa Bank Hoax to the news media once her operatives at Perkins Coie were finished creating it.
But what Durham revealed in the ‘Alfa Bank Hoax’ case [which is essentially what the Sussmann case was about fully revealing] is nothing compared to what he’s going to be showing the country in the ‘Steele Dossier case’. Which is what the Danchenko trial is going to be.
I’ve been saying this for some time now, and I still stand by it:
The Clinton campaign was not only penetrated by Russian agents at the highest level…it was also paying a Russian agent who was the Primary Sub Source [PSS] of the fake Steele Dossier to invent allegations accusing Donald Trump, General Flynn, Carter Page and others of being…Russian agents!
And Durham will prove this in court.
This is not me speculating. I’m not doing any wishcasting here. All the evidence on this was made public a long time ago. I’ve seen it. So have all the other SpyGate researchers that dug into this from the beginning.
Some people who think their role in all of this SpyGate business has gone undetected or uninvestigated are going to be surprised when they get one of these 30 subpoenas.
What Good Is Exposing A Criminal Conspiracy If You Never Get Around To Actually Prosecuting It?
But as my friends Tracy Beanz of Uncover DC and Adam Taylor of The Washington Pundit, have been pointing out for a long time now: what good does it do for Durham to **expose** the criminal conspiracy and the acts used to further that conspiracy if he’s not willing to **charge** people for the conspiracy?
Although Danchenko is facing five counts of making materially false statements to the FBI when Sussmann faced only a single such count, if he’s convicted and that’s it, that’s all we get, Durham will have exposed a massive criminal conspiracy spread out across the Clinton campaign, Perkins Coie, Fusion GPS, the FBI, the DOJ and more…without having charged a single person for being a part of the conspiracy.
Somehow I just don’t think that’s Durham’s big strategy. Expose all the crimes, let the perpetrators go.
But that’s just me.
We’ll see what happens.
Rise of the New Media Substack is sponsored by One Source Solutions, a great payment processor site run by and for patriots. Tired of cancel culture and worried about getting deplatformed by PayPal or some other Silicone Valley website? Here’s your answer.
Be sure to tell them Brian sent ya!
To support my independent journalism, you can also make a donation of any size to my Venmo, CashApp or PayPal accounts.
And I thank you for your support. :)
Brian, I sure pray you are right! However, I just don't see it. Durham was brought in by Jeff Sessions in 2017 and while his scope was not as broad as now, exactly what has he prosecuted to date and won? Who has he brought before Lady Liberty for justice? ZIP-ZERO-NADA
I really do pray that he finally brings accountability to the deep state puppets & masters, but as each day, week, month, year goes by, Durham is a big nothing burger put in place to keep *HOPE* vs action on people's minds.
Do we know where the case will be presented? Hopefully/Likely not DC 😎
Virginia?