Julian Assange Is Coming To America...
And When He Does, If He Talks, He Could Destroy Washington DC
Some lies are not fatal. They’re not of such consequential nature as to destroy those who are standing on them.
Other lies are fatal, since the tellers of the lies have constructed a literal House of Cards utilizing the lies as the very foundation stones upon which they stand, and when their lies collapse, so does their power.
Remember....
...the powers that be in DC have **surgically joined themselves at the hip** to the totally FAKE and FALSE and COMPLETELY FRAUDULENT narrative that RUSSIAN HACKERS stole the DNC emails remotely.
Only ONE MAN IN THE ENTIRE WORLD...
with more than eight billion people in it...
HAS THE POWER TO DESTROY THAT NARRATIVE AND THE PEOPLE WHO ARE STANDING ON TOP OF IT.
When their fake narrative collapses, so do they.
And that man who can make that collapse happen is... JULIAN ASSANGE.
Julian Assange **knows** who it was that **really** took the DNC emails via superfast transfer with a thumb drive from the DNC server.
And it wasn't “the Russians”.
Do you understand that?
Can you comprehend and work out the implications of what I'm telling you?
I’m sure its just an amazing coincidence that in between videos teasing his upcoming release of his interview with Assange inside the notorious Belmarsh prison, Tucker Carlson threw the entire world a curve ball by suddenly debuting a video where he’s interviewing controversial actor Kevin Spacey who is **pretending** to be not Kevin Spacey but instead the character he played in the television series “House of Cards” - the unbelievably corrupt US Senator/US President Frank Underwood.
If Tucker was trying to pique interest in his forthcoming Assange interview in this fashion, as far as I’m concerned, he succeeded.
Why Is The Fake Crowdstrike Narrative So Important Anyway?
Well because that fake Crowdstrike narrative was the basis for the first impeachment of Donald Trump.
You know why they impeached Trump that first time, right?
You didn't forget, did you?
No, I don't mean the bullshit excuse they proffered as a justification, that he was 'extorting' newly elected Ukrainian president Zelensky by 'threatening to withhold US military aid' unless Zelensky agreed to open up an investigation of The Biden Crime Family's activities in that country.
That's a cover story. It wasn’t the real reason they did it.
No, I’m referring to the real reason they rushed to create that super-fast Star Chamber impeachment of Trump run by Adam Schiff in the House based on false testimony from a fake CIA 'whistleblower' named Eric Ciaramella.
Go back and read the transcript of that ‘perfect phone call’ that Trump had with Zelensky.
What was the one single line that Trump said in that phone call that caused every single person in on the Crowdstrike hoax to shit themselves when Trump disclosed that he knew what they’d done?
It was the line about the DNC server.
Trump asked Zelensky about the DNC server that was supposedly 'hacked' by the Russians, the DNC server that the DNC emails were taken from, that had been leaked to Julian Assange and WikiLeaks before the 2016 election, the emails that were highly damaging to the Clinton campaign. Apparently, Trump was discussing the **current** location of that particular DNC server…
BEING IN UKRAINE.
I'm not making that up.
You may, if you so choose, check the transcript for yourself and find it there.
In black and white.
https://www.wired.com/story/trump-ukraine-call-crowdstrike-dnc-russia/
Every single person involved in selling the fake Crowdstrike report that the Russians had hacked the DNC server and stolen those emails literally SHIT THEMSELVES when they heard Trump say this to Zelensky:
One of my absolute favorite things to do when it comes to the whole fake ‘Russian hacking of the DNC server’ narrative and the entire House of Cards the Deep State had been laboriously building on the foundation of that fake claim is imagining the LOOK that came over Colonel Vindman's fat fuck of a face when he heard that Trump knew the DNC server was in Ukraine. And he was asking Zelensky about it, on a phone call where over a dozen people were listening in.
The moment Trump let the cat out of the bag that he knew the DNC server had been shipped off to Ukraine all the plotters who'd built the fake Crowdstrike narrative leaped into action to manufacture an impeachment of Trump to discredit any forthcoming disclosures he might make about the DNC server and the emails and how Assange and WikiLeaks got their hands on them.
Because you see, there’s a dead person at the center of all of this.
All roads lead to Ukraine. And to who really killed Seth Rich, the former DNC staffer who was killed in an ‘apparently robbery’ in Washington DC back on July 10, 2016.
Assange not only knows who actually gave him the DNC emails, he’s quite cognizant of what latter happened to that particular person.
Remember that.
Nobody knows better than Julian Assange how DC is going to utterly fall when the truth comes out. About why they created a false narrative about a ‘hack’ of the DNC server by “Russians” to cover over how those emails were actually taken and given to WikiLeaks…and what subsequently happened to the leaker.
Trump Declassified It ALL
Recall that Trump said in his Oct. 2020 tweet on this platform that not only had he ordered all the RussiaGate documentation declassified, he'd also...
What?
What else did he reveal that he had ordered the complete declassification of?
Read carefully:
Yes, Trump had also ordered the full and complete declassification of everything related to the Hillary Clinton Email scandal. You’d be surprised how many people don’t remember that.
Now whenever this issue is discussed, some well-meaning people - and some not so well-meaning people - quickly jump into the comments to 'remind' everyone that while Trump may have sincerely believed he could order this complete declassification as the President...he could not. Even as President, he did not actually possess this full declassification authority that he thought he enjoyed.
Along with everything else the Clarence Thomas SCOTUS is going to be asked to 'clarify' for certain people in the coming months, I believe the United States Supreme Court is also going to be 'asked' exactly what kind of declassification powers are possessed by the Chief Executive of the federal branch of our tripartite government. Since some people are going to spend the next year continuing to LOUDLY ARGUE that while he was President, Donald Trump did not actually have full declassification powers.
This is because as Julian Assange is extradited to the United States and appears before the US Congress' clean House for testimony related to
the Clinton Foundation's Haiti and Ukraine activities,
the Biden Crime Family’s Ukraine activities,
the actual identity of the DNC server leaker,
as well as the fake Crowdstrike narrative,
on the campaign trail Donald Trump is going to be quite publicly insisting that since he had declassified it all back in October of 2020, its perfectly fine if Assange is asked questions on these subjects and gives his answers publicly.
Meanwhile, certain OTHER people are going to be loudly and obstinately insisting that whatever Trump may have believed about his supposed magical declassification powers from 3 years prior, the CURRENT criminal administration RECLASSIFIED it all and for goodness sake, this Assange testimony will expose sources and methods if it is allowed to go forward and so it must halted and prevented at all costs!
And so my current perspective is that much of 2024 will play out with two very nationally visible competing narratives from two very different sources:
The first narrative will be that of Donald Trump on the campaign trail, appearing before adoring throngs across the fruited plain at increasingly massive rallies where he waxes rhapsodic about the declassification powers he enjoyed during his tenure in the nation's Oval Office...
The second will be comprised of an increasingly annoying Adam Schiff trapped in the nation's most vile and corrupt town, holding court for the Fake News Intelligence Agency stenographers as he stridently insists that the current sitting President, under siege by multiple Special Counsels for manifest corruption and mismanagement of the nation's affairs, had the authority to RECLASSIFY what Donald Trump had never really declassified in the first place.
One of these narratives is going to be totally jumbled, complex, incoherent and delivered by the absolute worst of representatives who currently enjoys one of the most awful reputations in a town of such awful reputations for having deliberately lied to the public for half a decade to sell the Russia hoax and who also directly led a literal star chamber impeachment of a sitting president over a hoax about Ukraine.
The other narrative shall be short, simple, concise, easily understood delivered by a master rhetorician riding a cresting wave of national adulation and popularity during a political campaign like nothing else this country has ever experienced before.
And at the center of the competing narratives will be the man who holds the fate of Washington DC in his hands.
You may have noticed that I referred just a moment ago to ‘The Clarence Thomas SCOTUS’, and some may object to me that John Roberts is the current Chief Justice of the Court.
Technically, such persons would be correct. TECHINCALLY.
But let’s be honest here: if it was JOHN ROBERTS that was in control of that Court right now, Roe v Wade, Affirmative Action and the Second Amendment would not have gotten the rulings they did in the last year. Thomas is the one exerting more and more influence over the court’s actual decisions.
When the SCOTUS is asked to weigh in on whether or not Trump could declassify certain things, and whether Assange may testify to his knowledge on certain subjects? Once again, who’s actually running that Court will become evident.
Its going to be Biblical.
My Sponsors:
Rise of the New Media is a READER-SUPPORTED PUBLICATION!
That means very single paying subscriber to this Substack newsletter is one of my sponsors. And I am so very deeply grateful to each and every one of them, because it is their regular monthly support that allows me to do this column writing and researching for a living.
Unlike Fake News propagandists, as an honest independent journalist, I don’t have a sugar daddy billionaire handing me money behind the scenes. I am supported by ordinary citizens and patriots. And it is AWESOME.
If you see value in my columns and livestreams and would like to support my independent journalism, you can become a paying subscriber for as little as $5/month. And I thank you for your support.
Rise of the New Media Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Patriot Switch:
I am helping American patriots MAKE THE SWITCH from buying needed groceries from the 11 Big Corporations out there that are pushing a ‘woke’ agenda on the country at the same time they are genetically modifying our food & selling us items that are toxic and are poisoning us. Learn about MAKING THE SWITCH yourself right here: patriotswitch.com/briancates
patriotswitch.com/BRIANCATES
The Rise of the New Media Substack is also sponsored by One Source Solutions, a great payment processor site run by and for patriot businesses. Tired of cancel culture and worried about getting deplatformed by PayPal or some other Silicon Valley website? Here’s your answer. Be sure to tell them Brian Cates sent you, because I get residuals for referrals. :)
And we have a new sponsor in Dr. Kirk Elliot and his team at K+E! If you need financial services or financial advice, they are a great place to find answers to your questions. You can find out what services are offered at K+E right here at this link.
To support my independent journalism, you can also make a donation of any size to my Venmo, CashApp accounts.
You can become a regular monthly supporter at Subscribestar:
https://www.subscribestar.com/brian-cates-political-pundit
You can also browse my merchandise store and toss me a few bucks while getting yourself some cool gear:
And I thank you for your support. :)
Excellent piece, Brian! I would only argue that Assange can't be the only one with the information, if for no other than as a Dead Man Switch. And, given the level of planning that has gone into The Great Awakening, neither can Our President be the only one to lead civilization through the greatest challenge of evil in history. To say there's too much at stake....
Interesting that the ‘no name agency’ has a long history of doing assassinations to coverup dirty deeds or prevent information being released to the public, or during an orchestrated coup. The other thing the ‘no name agency’ is known for doing? Killing all of the loose ends.....like a couple of illegal MS-13 members.... Can’t wait. God bless you, Brian.😃😃